Energizing Tournament

eiuu8l6a · Posted: Sat 18:29, 21 Sep 2013 Post subject: peuterey Gun Control

Morgan is a writer who works with Uk Best Writing service, He has experience of more than ten years in acdemic writing. He provides students with Uk research papers, ssays writing service UK and Uk essay service online.

I am an advocate in the issue of gun [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/peuterey.php]peuterey[/url] control, but I do feel that gun control will not reduce violent crime. I am not an advocate in banning guns, but I am an advocate for regulating gun control. I feel that there is not enough legislation or new laws being enacted by the Federal government. History has shown us that most of the homicide rates are due to gun violence. Although, there has been a decline in the illegal use of guns, and the homicide rates may have dropped, but guns are still used in most of the tragedies we read or hear about on the news.
For example, the tragedies at Virginia Tech, and at Columbine, were significant enough to enact stricter laws in obtaining guns. How were these young men able to get the guns they used in their horrific crime spree? How was Jared Loughner able to buy a semi-automatic weapon without a permit? He was responsible for the death of six people, and the shooting of Gabrielle Gifford (Shapiro,July). Jared Lougher might have not gone and shot those [url=http://www.getconversational.com]hollister france[/url] people if he was not sold a gun without a permit. How was he able to pass a background check? Better gun control laws could have prevented this.
Furthermore, in 1994, "congress passed what had been regarded as the most comprehensive effort at national gun control ("gun control policy "oct)." My question is do we understand what the real problem with gun control is? The laws that have been passed so far have not been very effective. The purpose of the Brady bill was to require a 5 day waiting period for purchasing a hand gun and the local law enforcement is to conduct a background check on all purchases being made ("gun control policy"oct). This is not going to stop anyone who wants a gun to get one.
If a person does not want to wait the 5 days, they could easily go out and find someone who sells [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/moncler.php]moncler outlet[/url] guns illegally. I do not think that the laws sole focus should be on gun dealers who legitimately sell guns, but [url=http://www.1855sacramento.com/moncler.php]moncler sito ufficiale[/url] have stricter laws on the ones who sell guns illegally. Accordingly, the law was rewritten and the background check is done automatically by the gun dealers through a national computer system and there is no waiting period (gun control policy"oct). This change in the law just makes it more imperative that gun laws be revised. I think [url=http://www.achbanker.com/home.php]www.achbanker.com/home.php[/url] there needs to be a national system that would prevent people from going state to state to purchase guns, because that person was denied access to one in their own state. I feel that gun control is of the utmost importance in our society because there is so much violence.
I do not believe that waiting periods and background checks are a solution to the problem of gun control. I am in favor of gun control, but I do not believe violence with guns is going to stop because the laws are stricter in their ability to get a gun. There are too many ways for a criminal to get a gun. The ones that have committed crimes before, already own a gun, and that's not going to stop them from committing further crimes. There are so many issues surrounding the availability of guns and who is using them and what they are being used for. Thus far, "there has been minimal concern from congress regarding new gun control at the federal level (Marvin, May)." The reason for this is because there is less concern and less support for the legislation of gun control. The last ruling on the issue of hand gun control was in June, 2010(Marvin, May). The Supreme Court ruled that people have the right to bear arms in cities and states ("do more guns"). The ruling was based on the second amendment. The second amendment is the right to own and carry weapons ("do more guns").
I am not against the second amendment, but there still needs to be some kind of restriction on being able to carry a weapon without being a peace officer. It is not realistic to think that civilians who own guns will be eliminated from our society. The problem is that congress is so afraid of taking away people's constitutional rights that the issue on gun control will never be resolved. I do not believe that citizens who carry guns are safer from criminals. I believe this because guns just lead to killing or wounding, [url=http://www.sandvikfw.net/shopuk.php]hollister sale[/url] no matter what the circumstances are. The states need to be more thorough in including relevant information into the national database. I believe that a person's mental health records, if available should be included into the criminal background check system. [url=http://www.mquin.com/giuseppezanotti.php]giuseppe zanotti sneakers[/url] I believe this because it is obvious if this information was available, most of the tragic shootings may not have taken place. The issue of privacy would come into play. Another question would be how much access the government should have to a person's background. However, the Brady Center, says that the constitution "does not guarantee individuals the right to own and carry guns ("do more guns")." I believe that tragedies increase when more people carry guns. I am not a member of any advocate group against or for gun control. I have my own beliefs on the issue. Essentially, hand gun control is not going to make our streets safe.
Not everyone who owns a hand gun is looking to commit a crime. There are legitimate and responsible people who own hand guns. When a person does not handle a gun responsibly or take precautions, is when gun accidents happen (teresi). To ensure safety, the owner should remove the ammunition from the gun and lock the gun up to avoid any possibility of a potential accident (teresi). I do believe that can help control the homicide rate, but I do not believe that it will eliminate violent crime. I live in upstate New York. I am 8 hours away from New York City and I live between Buffalo and Rochester. According to Chris Conte, "violent crime [url=http://www.davidhabchy.com]barbour sale[/url] in Rochester continues to decline (Conte)." There were 31 murders in 2011 and 41 in 2010 there were dozens of shootings over the last few weeks of 2011. According to police records, 143 people were shot in 2011(Conte). I believe that it is an individual's right to own a fire arm. I also feel that gun control would be in the best interest for all. If we had stricter gun laws then there would be fewer deaths in our country. Statistics have shown that thousands of people are murdered with guns. I believe that guns can be regulated. I am also a firm believer that the right to live is very important. More gun control would mean that less people would die.
Gun control needs to be decided by our state and local governments. I believe this because the states would be able to decide what is best for our communities. I believe that public safety should be the main concern when [url=http://www.davidhabchy.com]barbour outlet[/url] it comes to gun control. Gun regulation must be enforced. Laws for national gun control are needed. I think there are too many people getting killed by guns, and that all states should have strict laws. I do not believe guns save lives, but I do believe that a person has a right to defend themselves, but it can be harmful to the victim, and to the person doing the harm. I do believe wholeheartedly; less guns means less death by [url=http://www.mansmanifesto.fr]doudoune moncler[/url] guns. The strongest advocates for gun control are people who have experienced a personal tragedy with them. People who have had family members and friends killed or injured by a gun. The politicians will not be able to outlaw all guns. Even with stricter gun control laws, it is not going to guarantee that anyone will be safe from guns.
There are always going to be flaws in the laws that legislation, and the Federal government tries to enact. Criminals violate laws for their own personal gain. There have been only minor changes for gun control laws. The problem with enacting new laws is to not violate the second amendment right to bear arms. The Federal government does not know how to write new laws without [url=http://www.achbanker.com/home.php]hollister[/url] offending the anti- gun control advocates. I am not advocating for banning all guns, because that is not realistic. I [url=http://www.rtnagel.com/airjordan.php]jordan pas cher[/url] am an advocate for enacting laws to restrict certain individuals from being able to own guns, and to have better information available about the people who have the propensity to commit violent crimes with them. Regulation is key.
.
相关的主题文章：

[url=http://hccweb6.bai.ne.jp/nyanji/cgi-bin/aska.cgi]hollister pas cher EXTENSION [/url]

[url=http://www.188817.com/viewthread.php?tid=253626&extra=page%3D1&frombbs=1]hollister france Insurance Plan Maintain Firms To The Saving[/url]

[url=http://thepooldoctor.highersites.co.uk/forum/discussion/25702/giuseppe-zanotti-pas-cher-jobcentre-an-overview-of-uks-leading-recruitment-fi]giuseppe zanotti pas cher JobCentre -- An Overview Of UKs Leading Recruitment Fi[/url]